If it was another game I wouldn't care in the slightest(most of my fav games don't contain romances) but if they are deliberately playing to baldurs gate nostalgia I think its only fair to point out things bg does that this game doesn't.Įdit: even now theres a line on the front page that says: In regards to romances I agree, Im not saying they have/should be in games simply that I would prefer it if they were. So I don't think you can fault people for making comparisons. Pretty much every interview ive seen with obsidian sees them mentioning the old ie games and even the front page of the site featured a poll featuring a list of games u most want pillars to be like(bg was winning). But they've brought about the comparison on there own. Besides, why does this game necessarily have to be compared to BG? I mean, hopefully it's going to be a game of it's own, and not just an attempt to emulate BG.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |